few days ago my friend and colleague John Diroma blog published its positive opinion on the transaction Otam, you can read at this link . Today I would like to explain why my opinion is different from his. As is known in
area ex-Otam 66 apartments are being built in the Convention (according to a memorandum of understanding signed between housing associations and common) for the residential, or to keep people to live in Santa.
I believe that this initiative was and is a mistake.
We start from the heart of the problem, the official version. Otam The initiative, in my opinion, fails to protect residential, because of various aspects :
can participate in Santa or anyone residing in the district social health (basically the local towns), unless they already owns a house adequate in Santa Margherita, which means that it can participate in such a false resident of Rapallo or Zoagli so it can buy an apartment in Santa at a lower cost to the market.
The condition to which participants must comply is to living at home and obtained in ex-Otam area for 30 years, then finished the period of bonding, they can easily sell as second homes, and we can see what is happening to the houses of PEEP, which are increasingly sold on the market for just second homes.
What it takes to establish the convention that a person actually lives? Very stringent conditions (irony): requires you to have on-site residence, as if it were unknown to the idea of \u200b\u200bSanta false residents. Let us then look
cost. Today, the estimated cost ranges from 200,000 to € 550,000 depending on the floor and the floor area. These are the costs of today, and it should be noted that in Convention provided a mechanism price increase based on indicators that will work ISTAT to actual delivery. However, the defenders of the intervention show that this is in any case lower than market prices, so good.
Actually in my opinion is unfair to compare the prices of the market: the comparison should be made to the prices of other interventions in subsidized housing . And here is an obvious fault of the administration accepted the convention: should expect prices similar to those of other subsidized housing initiatives that are out there for Italy, if only because a brick is the same price Santa as Albenga or Forlì. The usual price
for subsidized housing around Italy are much lower than those dell'Otam , I have no official averages, but personally I found on the internet interventions that cost 60-70% less than was requested all'Otam and not in the Po Valley, but in Liguria.
It is said that the intervention Otam costs so much because the owner did not want to get off of the price: great strength! The owner knew of having the knife by the handle . Instead who can say what would be his position if he had found someone with the gonads that had suggested a different outcome? Something like: "if you claim so much for that then the apartments will be unrealistic price to cost for a housing that is credible as the protection of residential so you know what? Or drop in price or do you keep your shed as is without change of use, go ahead and go down the drain, so a few years we assess the possibility of expropriation ".
Otam The initiative, namely the construction Lodging in subsidized housing, is not credible as a form of protection for its residential inconsistency : will provide housing to approximately 130 people (if they are all people who want to really really live then) and only in 4 years, unless complications. Considering that Santa loses Each year about 100 people arrive at the calculation that should be easy to build nearly 40 new homes each year in subsidized housing. We can do such a thing? Or run the slight risk of cemented everything?
Notwithstanding all the above, in Santa we have so many empty houses and unused that the road to build new apartments to protect the residential is only a small tapullo very temporary, intended to create new second home in a few years.
You could do anything in Otam?
course. As long as the owner of it was confronted with an administration (or, better yet, a series of government) able to announce and consistently pursues the goal of "zero growth". In Santa
we need neither an apartment nor a box more . We need more. Just to give some examples: we need the famous convention center who often ask the hotel owners (who could take over the area and create it), a swimming pool for residents (and who cares if it is not size regulations for international competitions, just that it can be used by residents who otherwise have to go to Camogli and Rapallo) a space for non-polluting production activities (The jobs are left in the middle of the country, relegating elsewhere only responds to the logic of free space "fine" for real estate speculation), just a beautiful park that is usable and well kept .
In conclusion, in my opinion and wanting to try at all costs is positive, the 'Otam operation is certainly useful for a variety of subjects : for those who already have good disposable income and wants a house in Santa Margherita, for cooperatives continue to build and for the companies involved . Unfortunately, these limited benefits cost the country's new fuel real estate speculation (ready to be used in a few years experience has shown that PEEP), loss of an area that could be used to provide job opportunities or even services to the residents, the approval of yet another artifact sole property that now dominates the Riviera: apartments. Today real homes (at least in part, having regard to the Convention so permissive) tomorrow new second homes.
area ex-Otam 66 apartments are being built in the Convention (according to a memorandum of understanding signed between housing associations and common) for the residential, or to keep people to live in Santa.
I believe that this initiative was and is a mistake.
We start from the heart of the problem, the official version. Otam The initiative, in my opinion, fails to protect residential, because of various aspects :
can participate in Santa or anyone residing in the district social health (basically the local towns), unless they already owns a house adequate in Santa Margherita, which means that it can participate in such a false resident of Rapallo or Zoagli so it can buy an apartment in Santa at a lower cost to the market.
The condition to which participants must comply is to living at home and obtained in ex-Otam area for 30 years, then finished the period of bonding, they can easily sell as second homes, and we can see what is happening to the houses of PEEP, which are increasingly sold on the market for just second homes.
What it takes to establish the convention that a person actually lives? Very stringent conditions (irony): requires you to have on-site residence, as if it were unknown to the idea of \u200b\u200bSanta false residents. Let us then look
cost. Today, the estimated cost ranges from 200,000 to € 550,000 depending on the floor and the floor area. These are the costs of today, and it should be noted that in Convention provided a mechanism price increase based on indicators that will work ISTAT to actual delivery. However, the defenders of the intervention show that this is in any case lower than market prices, so good.
Actually in my opinion is unfair to compare the prices of the market: the comparison should be made to the prices of other interventions in subsidized housing . And here is an obvious fault of the administration accepted the convention: should expect prices similar to those of other subsidized housing initiatives that are out there for Italy, if only because a brick is the same price Santa as Albenga or Forlì. The usual price
for subsidized housing around Italy are much lower than those dell'Otam , I have no official averages, but personally I found on the internet interventions that cost 60-70% less than was requested all'Otam and not in the Po Valley, but in Liguria.
It is said that the intervention Otam costs so much because the owner did not want to get off of the price: great strength! The owner knew of having the knife by the handle . Instead who can say what would be his position if he had found someone with the gonads that had suggested a different outcome? Something like: "if you claim so much for that then the apartments will be unrealistic price to cost for a housing that is credible as the protection of residential so you know what? Or drop in price or do you keep your shed as is without change of use, go ahead and go down the drain, so a few years we assess the possibility of expropriation ". Otam The initiative, namely the construction Lodging in subsidized housing, is not credible as a form of protection for its residential inconsistency : will provide housing to approximately 130 people (if they are all people who want to really really live then) and only in 4 years, unless complications. Considering that Santa loses Each year about 100 people arrive at the calculation that should be easy to build nearly 40 new homes each year in subsidized housing. We can do such a thing? Or run the slight risk of cemented everything?
Notwithstanding all the above, in Santa we have so many empty houses and unused that the road to build new apartments to protect the residential is only a small tapullo very temporary, intended to create new second home in a few years.
You could do anything in Otam? course. As long as the owner of it was confronted with an administration (or, better yet, a series of government) able to announce and consistently pursues the goal of "zero growth". In Santa
we need neither an apartment nor a box more . We need more. Just to give some examples: we need the famous convention center who often ask the hotel owners (who could take over the area and create it), a swimming pool for residents (and who cares if it is not size regulations for international competitions, just that it can be used by residents who otherwise have to go to Camogli and Rapallo) a space for non-polluting production activities (The jobs are left in the middle of the country, relegating elsewhere only responds to the logic of free space "fine" for real estate speculation), just a beautiful park that is usable and well kept .
In conclusion, in my opinion and wanting to try at all costs is positive, the 'Otam operation is certainly useful for a variety of subjects : for those who already have good disposable income and wants a house in Santa Margherita, for cooperatives continue to build and for the companies involved . Unfortunately, these limited benefits cost the country's new fuel real estate speculation (ready to be used in a few years experience has shown that PEEP), loss of an area that could be used to provide job opportunities or even services to the residents, the approval of yet another artifact sole property that now dominates the Riviera: apartments. Today real homes (at least in part, having regard to the Convention so permissive) tomorrow new second homes.
0 comments:
Post a Comment