happens even here in Santa that among the components of the electoral and / or advisers, or even worse as outside assessors, they are not people residents in the municipality that end to administer . This, in my
opinion a big mistake.
As these people may be competent and honest, unfortunately two types of congenital deficiencies absolutely .
the first. No live n the country , which means that at the end not know enough about the country. Even if they have local contacts, this does not make up for the fact that not "feel" the situation and the life of the country. Do not run every day for Santa, do not address every day to offer local services and for the thousand daily needs, their children do not attend local schools, the normal network of relationships, relationships and friendships (real source of information field) does not work like that of a local inhabitant. In short: not have the sensitivity to the situation of Santa that is acquired only through many years of daily attendance, surrounded by a network of local relations as many days and years border.
the second. not feel the country as "proper" . An outsider, even if he works in Santa, however, does not feel like something of his own: he sees it as a collection of resources and problems, in a rather mechanistic, and thus loses the idea of \u200b\u200btemporal continuity of a community and of a place, providing for all the logic of the objective immediate, to the detriment of efficiency, but especially the future.
Concerning in particular the members of the junta non-local , justified their use as "operational arm" of the mayor , a sort of technical department reporting directly to the mayor. It makes me observe, first, that this vision of the mayor as "CEO" of the city , with enormous powers and virtually no one to answer for if not the next election, I find absolutely agree : sovereignty belongs to the people who do not transfer to anyone, not even with elections, and the mayor is only one administrator. Secondly I think that people also come in have elected them, as bearers of local authorities and representatives of local citizens, and perhaps also have independent thinking head, is an asset to the body arrived, and not a limitation.
Another objection that is made is that you must check the jurisdiction where it is, and then embark on a number of external roles if necessary, perhaps post after being elected.
I am now to inquire: " if you need to find expertise elsewhere, because there has been presented with a list of incompetent people? . And then it is considered that, if people voted because they thought those people to trust is just that, and not others. In case of need 'particular and specific and' can always use advice bounded in time and cost.
Let us entrust the administration only to those 'native', who live and love their city, and we'll have some better results.
opinion a big mistake.
As these people may be competent and honest, unfortunately two types of congenital deficiencies absolutely .
the first. No live n the country , which means that at the end not know enough about the country. Even if they have local contacts, this does not make up for the fact that not "feel" the situation and the life of the country. Do not run every day for Santa, do not address every day to offer local services and for the thousand daily needs, their children do not attend local schools, the normal network of relationships, relationships and friendships (real source of information field) does not work like that of a local inhabitant. In short: not have the sensitivity to the situation of Santa that is acquired only through many years of daily attendance, surrounded by a network of local relations as many days and years border. 
the second. not feel the country as "proper" . An outsider, even if he works in Santa, however, does not feel like something of his own: he sees it as a collection of resources and problems, in a rather mechanistic, and thus loses the idea of \u200b\u200btemporal continuity of a community and of a place, providing for all the logic of the objective immediate, to the detriment of efficiency, but especially the future. Concerning in particular the members of the junta non-local , justified their use as "operational arm" of the mayor , a sort of technical department reporting directly to the mayor. It makes me observe, first, that this vision of the mayor as "CEO" of the city , with enormous powers and virtually no one to answer for if not the next election, I find absolutely agree : sovereignty belongs to the people who do not transfer to anyone, not even with elections, and the mayor is only one administrator. Secondly I think that people also come in have elected them, as bearers of local authorities and representatives of local citizens, and perhaps also have independent thinking head, is an asset to the body arrived, and not a limitation.
Another objection that is made is that you must check the jurisdiction where it is, and then embark on a number of external roles if necessary, perhaps post after being elected. I am now to inquire: " if you need to find expertise elsewhere, because there has been presented with a list of incompetent people? . And then it is considered that, if people voted because they thought those people to trust is just that, and not others. In case of need 'particular and specific and' can always use advice bounded in time and cost.
Let us entrust the administration only to those 'native', who live and love their city, and we'll have some better results.
0 comments:
Post a Comment